NH4

 

North Hants

Hash House Harriers

 

NH4 HOME

 

 

 

 

NEXT HASH

 

Hashes start at 11am when it gets too dark for evening runs (mid-September) and 6pm during summer unless otherwise indicated in red

 

Summer starts when the clocks change at the end of March and ends about mid-September.

 

Number Date Time Venue Grid ref Hares On-inn Notes

2074

Dec 16

12:00 pm

The post-Christmas Party Run

Wellington Statue

854511

No Entry

Tweseldown Inn ??

 

 

 

Hash notes pre-2000th        Hash notes post-2000th

 

 

 

 

 

Old news lies below the Run List

 

 
 

 

Hash List  2017/2018

 

Highlighted hash numbers have photographs and a selection of comments

 

Highlighted runs NEED HARES

 

Deviations from the start time or changes to previously published information are marked in RED

Coordinate Finder

 

It is the hare's responsibility to check that the times, dates and coordinates are correct.

The website linked above is very useful.

 

Number

Date

Time

Venue

Grid Ref

SU unless noted

Hares

On-Inn

Notes

               

2072

Dec 02

11:00 am

Joint run with

Berkshire and Hursley HHH

 ‘More of the Good Stuff’ café

on Dummer Down Farm

577450

Tailspinner

Loud and Tasteless

Bob the Virgin

Old Thumper

 

 RG25 2AR

2073

Dec 09

11:00 am

Bentley Recreational Ground Car Park

GU10 5JP

787442

Silvier Fox

Petal

Jolly Farmer at Blacknest

Live hares

Walkers to follow flour at start. Run under an hour.

2074

Dec 16

12:00 pm

The post-Christmas Party Run

Wellington Statue

854511

Mountain Rescue

Tweseldown Inn ??

 

2075

Dec 23

11:00 am

 

 

No Entry

Fun Size

No Entry's gaff

 

2076

Dec 30

11:00 am

Medical Centre Car-Park, Anstey Road

Alton  

724399

Flying Doctor

 

 

2077

Jan 6

11:00 am

 

 

Fairy Snow

Old Thumper

 

 

2078

Jan 13

 

 

 

 

 

 

2079

Jan 20

 

 

 

 

 

 

2080

Jan 27

 

 

 

 

 

 

2081

Feb 3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Winter Getaway to Swanage

 

2082

Feb 9

 

 

 

 

 

 

2083

Feb 10

 

 

 

 

 

 

2084

Feb 17

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At an unusually brief, concise, uncontroversial and largely inaudible AGM, the new committee has been elected.

 

 

What a fantastic summer weekend away. Even by the normal high standards of this event, 2018 was brilliant.

 

Many thanks to the organisers of the Summer getaway to Swanage, the hares

and to all of you that came along and enjoyed a really special time in glorious sunshine.

 

 

When is a Roman VIII not a Roman IIX?

 

 

 

 

 

FYI for you smartasses that thought that there was a misspelling on the 2000th T-shirt:

Jane Austin (1831 - 1894) was a prolific American authoress who lived in Massachusetts and travelled to New Hampshire.

 

Many thanks to the committee and hares who made NH4's 2000th Hash such an enjoyable event

 

 

The new committee has been elected. Click on the picture to see them in full detail - if you dare

 

 

BOURLEY ROAD CAR PARK CLOSURE: Message from Mountain Rescue

Updates on Bourley Road  (13th July)

 

Update regarding

 

Bourley Road

 

Tweseldown

 

There's a Government initiative to get the old folks doing some sort of sport

Shame it didn't work.


 

 

NEWSLETTER #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 #11 #12 #13 #14 #15 #16 #17

FALSE TRAIL EDITION #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7

Shiggy Scribbles Nov 2013

More photos from Uganda

No Entry's Page of Runs

 Photos from Lisbon HHH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Several observant hashers have been ruminating about the Roman eight where the format of XIIX has been used to represent the number 18. They maintain that the correct format should be XVIII. We had a similar query in 2008 or MMIIX or even MMVIII. Their argument is that IIX is not correct Roman for 8.

 

First of all, on the hash there are no rules.

 

Secondly, the Romans would have used VIII for 8, but they would not have used IX for 9 since subtractive notation was only introduced centuries later; they would have used VIIII. Subtractive notation only became common when clocks were invented in the XIVth century to save space on the clock dial. So, IIX obeys no Roman rules, but it is not prohibited. It is simply an uncommonly used form. However, it has the merits of being symmetrical, XVIII would not fit in the space available and I LIKE IT.