![]() |
NH4
North Hants Hash House Harriers
|
Virtual hashes take place on Sundays at 18:00 hrs as advertised by email from Shrinky Dink
NEXT REAL HASHES
Hashing may resume on Good Friday 2nd April 2021, NH4's 40th Anniversary
Before going to a hash, you MUST register to confirm your attendance so that appropriate groupings of six can be arranged.
You must also read the NH4 COVID-19 Risk Assessment and Guidelines kindly prepared (and updated 19.12.20) by Libby.
Number | Date | Time | Venue | Grid ref | Hares | On-inn | Notes |
2156 |
02 Apr 2021 |
Good Friday NH4 40th Anniversary Run |
|
|
|
|
Old news lies below the Run List
Hash List 2021
|
|||||||||
Number |
Date |
Time |
Venue |
Grid Ref SU unless noted |
Hares |
On-Inn |
Notes |
||
Dec 13 2020 |
10:40 am onwards |
Southwood Woodland car park |
No Entry |
|
|
||||
Dec 20 2020 |
10:40 am onwards |
Playground car park, School Lane, Bentley GU10 5LP |
Jolly Green Giant Old Thumper |
|
|||||
Hashing suspended but may resume on ....
|
|||||||||
2156 |
02 Apr 2021 |
Good Friday NH4 40th Anniversary Run |
|
|
|
||||
2157 |
04 Apr |
|
Easter Sunday Run |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
The Swanage Weekend was cancelled
Mountain Rescue has alerted us to this petition. Sign up if you agree - AND WHY WOULDN'T YOU?
Petition to Maintain public access to MOD land in Aldershot
The new committee for 2020 has been elected; it's mainly the old committee plus Yellow Peril. Click HERE for details and HERE for the minutes.
FYI for you smartasses that thought that there was a misspelling on the 2000th T-shirt:
Jane Austin (1831 - 1894) was a prolific American authoress who lived in Massachusetts and travelled to New Hampshire.
There's a Government initiative to get the old folks doing some sort of sport
Shame it didn't work.
NEWSLETTER #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 #11 #12 #13 #14 #15 #16 #17
FALSE TRAIL EDITION #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7
Shiggy Scribbles Nov 2013
|
|
|
Longmoor Ranges, Forest Road, Liss GU33 7RA |
Silvier Fox Petal |
|
A small and very busy car park.
|
Several observant hashers have been ruminating about the Roman eight where the format of XIIX has been used to represent the number 18. They maintain that the correct format should be XVIII. We had a similar query in 2008 or MMIIX or even MMVIII. Their argument is that IIX is not correct Roman for 8. |
|
First of all, on the hash there are no rules.
Secondly, the Romans would have used VIII for 8, but they would not have used IX for 9 since subtractive notation was only introduced centuries later; they would have used VIIII. Subtractive notation only became common when clocks were invented in the XIVth century to save space on the clock dial. So, IIX obeys no Roman rules, but it is not prohibited. It is simply an uncommonly used form. However, it has the merits of being symmetrical, XVIII would not fit in the space available and I LIKE IT.